Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/08/01/09:47:08
Nicholas,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 10:33:45AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 23:43, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> > Then it appears that Rebase will never be part of setup until this
> > issue is solved.
>
> Why? Detection of ME is not-that-hard.
Bummers. I guess that it's too late to reply with the following:
Good. Now I don't have to feel lame about taking forever and then
some to add rebase to setup.exe.
:,)
Instead, I will respond with the following:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-08/msg00003.html
> My first comment to Jason about rebasing was that we should implement it
> via libbfd. I think the whole ME thing demonstrates that quite nicely.
If you figure out how to use libbfd to perform rebasing, then I would be
quite willing to rework my low-level rebase routines to use this instead
of ReBaseImage().
Thanks,
Jason
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -