Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: GCC 3.x Binaries
From:	Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	"Peuser, Mike" <mike DOT peuser AT honeywell DOT com>
Cc:	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<0E3BC6B0EE47D611AC2400034799FB7122E719@OLTEX640>
References:	<0E3BC6B0EE47D611AC2400034799FB7122E719 AT OLTEX640>
Date:	01 Aug 2002 10:41:20 +1000
Message-Id:	<1028162480.2788.577.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0

--=-Frq0J5FOAZ+UVgZILtxK
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 10:21, Peuser, Mike wrote:
> Is there a plan to update the Cygwin Net Release process to provide GCC 3=
.x binaries instead of the 2.95.x ones? If so,
> where can I find this plan?

I think you've got us confused with an IT shop with formal
methodologies. Try searching google for "GCC 3 cygwin Chris Faylor" and
you'll get lots of useful references. The short version: gcc 3.x is
coming real soon now.

Rob


--=-Frq0J5FOAZ+UVgZILtxK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEABECAAYFAj1Ig7AACgkQI5+kQ8LJcoKViwCfcihW5W6z4rz7SZIJOwabCICD
+1sAniegZlehgKUxWZlVA7JGHRdGGF/B
=tiOQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-Frq0J5FOAZ+UVgZILtxK--

- Raw text -