Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/07/31/12:29:55
Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> --- Michael A Chase <mchase AT ix DOT netcom DOT com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 09:59:00 -0400 "Gordon R. Keehn"
> > <grkeehn AT us DOT ibm DOT com> wrote:
> >
> > > If Bill Gates is laughing, it's because people actually paid
> > money,
> > > directly or through an hardware vendor,
>
> Like IBM? IIRC, they were shipping NetVistas [possibly Thinkpads,
> too] with WinME. *Tsk* *Tsk* Isn't that like the pot calling the
> kettle black?
>
> Seriously, though, I didn't pay a dime for this notebook. I got it
> for free for winning an employee contest at the place I work.
Good for you. Yes, IBM did offer NetVista's with ME. I bought one
myself. The second time I booted it, it was to do a cold install of
Win2K Pro, which I immediately upgraded to SP1. (It's now at SP2, and in
a few months, I'll bring it up to SP3.) When it's the only game in town,
there's no shame in playing.
>
> > > for an abomination like ME. Now that SP1 is expected
> > momentarily, you
> > > owe it to yourself, not to Billy G, to
> > > upgrade to XP Pro at the earliest opportunity.
>
> As a general rule of thumb, I usually don't upgrade until SP2 comes
> out. Windows2000 has its own issues, which I won't elaborate on. As
> for XP, I don't know about anyone else, but I find the XP window
> manager to be abyssmal. I hate all that damned color and the menus
> are all wrong. I don't need any of that crap, as it looks like it
> would frankly be fairly resource intensive.
No software product is perfect, including Service Packs. If they were,
people like me would be out of work. Still, Service Pack 1 *should*
cover most of the serious issues that made it through beta. That's a
matter of personal choice. I could live without the changes XP made to
the UI, as well. My wife's Thinkpad and my NetVista systems are running
Win2K -- the third is RedHat 7.2; I see no reason to upgrade until
forced by my next hardware purchase. If (God forbid!) I were still
running ME, though, I'm not sure I'd wait for the upcoming service pack
before upgrading.
User interface changes are inconvenient, and I rarely (never?) see a
valid reason why they're necessary. (And Microsoft isn't the only, nor
even necessarily the worst, offender.) If I upgrade an operating system
or a product, I do it because the new version has features that I want
(or need). User interface is not a factor in the decision.
>
> > Or at least to Win 95.
>
> *Sigh*, if only it were possible to go back to Win98SE, which [IMHO]
> was the most stable version of Windows to date. Unfortunately,
> Compaq has not backported its proprietary drivers [the WinME drivers
> don't work on Win98SE].
I originally went from Win98SE to Win2K because I was tired of reloading
Windows and reinstalling all my products twice a year. (Usually when the
time spent rebooting after blue-screen lockups exceeded my productive
time.) I now have responsibility for two systems running Win2K Pro. One
has been stable since I built it, the other I reloaded (after 18 months)
because I originally upgraded rather than doing a cold install, and
wanted to get rid of some excess baggage. In that time I can't honestly
say I've never had a blue screen, but I can't say I have, either, which
means that it's been so long and they're so rare that I don't remember.
>
> Cheers,
> Nicholas
>
> --
>
This is not (or at least, is not intended to be) a flame-fest. Personal
computers imply a large degree of personal choice, and I don't expect you
to agree with me (except in those cases where I'm obviously right ;-{)>
). I've been managing systems for a lot of years on a lot of platforms,
and suppose I've become a bit philosophical about the whole thing. The
only two absolutes are, software ALWAYS has bugs, and the best user
interface is ALWAYS the one I'm using now.
--
----
Gordon R. Keehn, CPSM Change Team
CICS/390 Service, USA
Gordon Keehn/Raleigh/IBM AT IBMUS, 1-919-254-1690
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -