Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 30 Jul 2002 07:37:20 -0400
From:	Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
Subject:	Re: FAQ or bash bug with ntsec? (WAS: Help request: bash with PAT H
	problems)
In-reply-to:	<20020730125100.D3921@cygbert.vinschen.de>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-followup-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id:	<20020730113720.GB1916@tishler.net>
MIME-version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4i
References:	<1264BCF4F426D611B0B00050DA782A50027EFF9F AT mail DOT gft DOT com>
	<20020730125100 DOT D3921 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>

On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 12:51:00PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> What I don't understand, though, is, why the permissions are set to
> that value by setup.exe.  I thought it should give explicitely full
> permissions to world.  At least I recall that I added some code to
> setup.exe setting the security descriptor.  Is it not used in setup
> anymore???

Someone on the pgsql-cygwin list had the same problem with postgres.exe.
After helping him, I ask him to determine why the permissions were only
set to "-rwx------".  Unfortunately, he never reported back.  Could it
be that users are setting "Install For" to "Just Me"?

Jason

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -