Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:54:15 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Is it possible to get a read-only subscription to cygwin-developers, to listen and learn?
Message-ID:	<20020725155415.GF10541@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<80575AFA5F0DD31197CE00805F650D767B2271 AT wilber DOT adroit DOT com> <001b01c233e6$4c206000$0100a8c0 AT wdg DOT uk DOT ibm DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<001b01c233e6$4c206000$0100a8c0@wdg.uk.ibm.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 03:19:32PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
>>> From: Max Bowsher [mailto:maxb AT ukf DOT net]
>>> Subject: Is it possible to get a read-only subscription to
>>> cygwin-developers, to listen and learn?
>>> ...
>>> Would you consider the creation of a
>>> 'cygwin-developers-readonly@' list? I
>>> imagine that it would be possible to create it as an
>>> announcement list, and then
>>> subscribe the post address for the new list to cygwin-developers@ ?
>
>Robinow, David wrote:
>>  I find perusal of the archives sufficient to keep up with what's
>> going on.
>
>True, that is an alternative. However, everything else cygwin-related comes to
>me via email, so I would much prefer my idea. I guess it all depends whether cgf
>is feeling mean at the moment :-)

It's more of a question of whether there is a mechanism to do this with
ezmlm.  AFAIK, there isn't.

I also have to admit that I am not really wild about the idea of adding
lurkers to the cygwin-developers mailing list.  We've already seen much
confusion where people are cc'ing cygwin-apps instead of cygwin and vice
versa.  We occasionally even see this with current cygwin-developers
subscribers.  Making cygwin-developers available to non-subscribers,
even via a read-only mechanism, will certainly open the door to more
annoying cross-mailing-list traffic.  I think there is nearly a 100%
certainty of this.

So, the web is the best mechanism for reading what's going on in
cygwin-developers.  Sorry.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -