Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: as one gets roots - rights ...
From:	Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT syncretize DOT net>
To:	Norbert Pfeiffer <norbert AT itbw DOT de>
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<010f01c233d8$9d55e5c0$1f00a8c0@npf>
References:	<006101c2336f$6a69cbe0$1f00a8c0 AT npf>
	<007101c233c9$9ef90c40$0100a8c0 AT wdg DOT uk DOT ibm DOT com>
	<010f01c233d8$9d55e5c0$1f00a8c0 AT npf>
Date:	25 Jul 2002 22:44:39 +1000
Message-Id:	<1027601080.14041.2.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0

On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 22:41, Norbert Pfeiffer wrote:
> Hi Max,
> 
> thanks, goes naturally also.
> This is IMHO a very quick and dirty hack,
> because it is valid only for this problem.

Actually, most unix based code that blindly requires root rights to
perform operations is broken. Such code won't run correctly in an
environment with capabilities, or granular permissions, or other similar
behaviour.

Adding cygwin specific tests is one approach, but still flawed. IMO the
correct approach is to test to see whether the action can be completed,
and if it can not be, croak at that point, rather than assuming some
arbitrary external condition ust be true before trying.

Anyway, just my 43c :}.

Rob


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -