Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/07/24/09:25:35
Jens,
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 10:20:49PM +0200, Jens Schuessler wrote:
> > I've compiled Mutt now with --enable-dotlock=NO
>
> IMO, the above is a bad idea because you are defeating one
> of the standard ways to lock a file to prevent corruption if
> there are multiple writers (e.g., mutt and procmail).
I ended up recompiling with out dotlock my self, because I
found that regardless of permissions on the mail file and
its directory ( I belive I tried all possible combos) I
couldnt get things to work right with dotlock on. My
problem was different, but there you have it. course, i'd
love to be proven wrong. :-)
> If you get a "5" (instead of "0"), then the permissions of
> /var/spool/mail are not correct.
>
> Please try running mutt_dotlock -t on your mbox. Does it
> indicate incorrect permissions?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -