Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sun, 21 Jul 2002 19:07:53 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Reply-to field Was: Re: Sleepy Cat Berkeley DB no longer in binary distribution
Message-ID:	<20020721230753.GA4030@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<1027231598 DOT 7101 DOT 0 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0207211011360 DOT 1384-100000 AT toos>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.CYG.4.44.0207211011360.1384-100000@toos>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 10:13:29AM +0100, Raphael wrote:
>On 21 Jul 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
>>Yes, don't email folk direct unless they are part of an existing
>>conversation!
>
>Would be a great help if the list manager could be convinced to set a
>reply-to field to the list.

Go back and read the thread again.  The person started out by Cc'ing
Robert directly.  There is no way that setting a Reply-To would help
in that scenario.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -