delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: | http://gmane.org/ |
Path: | not-for-mail |
From: | "Dylan Cuthbert" <dylan AT q-games DOT com> |
Newsgroups: | gmane.os.cygwin |
Subject: | Re: Available for test: gcc-3.1.1-3, gcc2-2.95.3-9, gcc-mingw-3_1-20020516-2 |
Date: | Wed, 17 Jul 2002 23:03:02 +0900 |
Lines: | 48 |
Message-ID: | <ah3tb7$1s9$1@main.gmane.org> |
References: | <20020715210550 DOT GA17619 AT redhat DOT com> <ah0bkt$s62$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <ah38u7$i1g$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <20020717130113 DOT GD28334 AT redhat DOT com> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | pppa20.kyoto-ip.dti.ne.jp |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Trace: | main.gmane.org 1026914472 1929 210.159.246.20 (17 Jul 2002 14:01:12 GMT) |
X-Complaints-To: | usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:01:12 +0000 (UTC) |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Newsreader: | Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 |
If the debugger worked, yes I would *of course* run gdb and see where it crashes. At the moment when I run the debugger (the latest exp version of gdb) it puts its "start of main" breakpoint in a piece of code that is nowhere near main and when I try to step or run my program, my program seg-faults. The debugger at this point freezes completely. I have compiled the entire source code with -ggdb and even -g but to no avail. As I may have mentioned, the program we are developing uses a large amount of modern C++ (boost/mpl/loki etc) and it seems to kind of push the compiler and gdb to their limits. Simpler programs I've compiled and tested work fine. I'm clutching at straws, which is why I was asking about ABI changes between -march=pentiumpro and -march=pentium2/3, would alignment adjustments in the linker (I think you mentioned you had to revert some changes to get the old gcc to work properly?) Now, the reasons I'm mailing to this list are that the program works *fine* without the -mpentium2/3 option to gcc. It also works *fine* even with those options if I run it from a command.com bash shell. The program itself is a 3d OpenGL program and a non-cygwin application (although not currently compiling with -mno-cygwin because mingw wasn't up to gccv3.1 until recently), the program (when it runs from a command.com bash shell) exhibits absolutely no problems at all. When it is able to run from rxvt at all, simply no output appears whatsoever... when it doesn't run, it crashes immediately and doesn't even write a stackdump file. The problem might simply be gcc-related but its odd how it is broken "in combination" with rxvt. Just trying to catch some of these problems before they get to other people... any help appreciated. Regards --------------------------------- Q-Games, Dylan Cuthbert. http://www.q-games.com PS. rxvt seems to have a no. of problems - sometimes pushing ctrl-o simply freezes it completely, I haven't tracked down the exact conditions but it is really annoying sometimes. .Clicking on the top-right close-window button when it is running a child-process causes the window to disappear but the task to keep running.- type "sleep 1h" into an rxvt shell, close the window with the X button and type ps in another shell and you'll see what I mean... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |