Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 15 Jul 2002 08:01:31 -0700
From:	Dario Alcocer <alcocer AT helixdigital DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: gzip.exe as symlink...
Message-ID:	<20020715080131.A27297@ns.helixdigital.com>
References:	<m2znwtbli8 DOT fsf AT swift DOT shore DOT net> <09b601c22bc1$ec09e870$2300a8c0 AT LAPTOP> <005601c22be1$c1fb8f00$0100a8c0 AT wdg DOT uk DOT ibm DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To:	<005601c22be1$c1fb8f00$0100a8c0@wdg.uk.ibm.com>; from maxb@ukf.net on Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 10:26:53AM +0100

On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 10:26:53AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Never mind emacs - surely it makes more sense for gzip to be the real file, and
> gunzip to be the symlink? Isn't that what most people would automatically
> assume?

Yes.  I'd say that this qualifies as packaging bug.

OTOH, I agree with Rob that the NTemacs package in question is
probably broken also.

-- 
Dario Alcocer -- Sr. Software Developer, Helix Digital Inc.
alcocer AT helixdigital DOT com -- http://www.helixdigital.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -