Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/07/15/09:53:07
Gary,
Sorry for the sluggish response time -- it is not for a lack of
interest...
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 02:02:12AM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> > Although, I have been considering trying to wrestle it away from
> > Gary. :,)
>
> I've been considering the exact same thing, but I was a bit reluctant
> to breach the subject, as your cup already looks like it overfloweth
> ;-).
It is and my shop vac and sump pump are broken too! :,)
> But if you'd be willing to maintain it, I'd be more than happy
> to step down. Mutt deserves much more attention than I've been able
> to give it, and now with working fetchmail and procmail and the
> associated potential interoperability issues, I completely agree that
> it would make sense for you to take over.
I am willing with the caveat below.
> > Since I already maintain Cygwin fetchmail and procmail
> > and I'm a "heavy" Cygwin mutt user, this may make sense...
>
> That's been my main problem I guess; I'm *not* a heavy mutt user, I
> just use it occaisionally to send emails from scripts. I got it to
> the point where that works reliably from text mounts and then
> dereliction of duty set in.
I didn't know that you have already dealt with the text vs. binary mode
issues. This is good news.
> Let's do this (again, if you're willing to take over): No Sleep 'Til 1.4. I
> don't hit the sack tonight until I've finished and uploaded the mutt-1.4-1
> package. That'll be my swan song, and then if everybody's in agreement and we
> can get all the proper clearances, mutt and hence all of Cygwin's mail
> functionality is Tishler territory forevermore ;-).
I'm really backed up right now. Would you be willing to deal with the
currently reported problems?
o source package seems to be broken
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-07/msg01097.html
o read-only mbox problem under Windows 9x/Me
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-07/msg00963.html
o lock count exceeded problem
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-07/msg01097.html
I'm willing (without coercion) to assume maintainership after the above
have been resolved. Otherwise, I'm still willing to assume
maintainership but I cannot guarantee when the above will be resolved.
BTW, does your mutt build display international characters correctly?
Mine does not.
Thanks,
Jason
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -