delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/07/15/08:36:57

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <20020715123651.12383.qmail@web21007.mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 05:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nicholas Wourms <nwourms AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject: Re: Available for test: gcc-3.1.1-2 gcc2-2.95.3-8
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <20020715052013.GA18499@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0

--- Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 12:46:17AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >Question about threading models for -mno-cygwin:
> 
> Threading should work correctly for either the -mno-cygwin or the
> -mcygwin
> cases.
> 
> >Also, I've seen repeated references that "mingw's compiler will be
> built 
> >with dwarf2 exceptions".
> 
> Cygwin and mingw are using the same code base now.  So both use dwarf2
> exceptions.
> 
> >(If so, then the "regular" mingw build -- which is claimed to be use
> >dwarf2 EH, and the cygiwn build will both have dwarf2 EH, since
> >mknetrel/extra/gcc *doesn't* say --enable-sjlj...) Which is good.  If
> >I'm right.
> 
> Right.  I've actually mentioned this in a previous message and I'm sure
> I'll be mentioning it again.
> 
> Maybe we need a GCC FAQ.  Or maybe the (currently nonexistent) gcc
> README
> should mention this.
> 
> FWIW, I'm on build #4010 right now.  "gcc -mno-cygwin -E" wasn't working
> right.
> 

Not to presume to tell you what to do, but perhaps it might be prudent to
go ahead and use the gcc-3.2 branch instead.  If I read it correctly, they
are planning a gcc-3.2.1 release when the gcc-3.1.2 was supposed to be
released (and the webpage says GCC 3.1.2 release [Sep 15 2002]).  I
suppose it depends on how you look at it, but skipping to gcc-3.2 might
save some headaches in regards to YA C++ ABI change.  I suppose the mingw
people would have to do the same, so I guess if they aren't on board then
this can't be done.  It may not be the best idea to release a development
branch based version, but it may save many headaches in the future,
especially given the fickle nature of windows shared libraries.  Just my
2c on the situation...

Cheers,
Nicholas


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
http://autos.yahoo.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019