Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/07/15/02:48:50
>
>Sure does. How long are they estimating before 3.1.2 is released? (That
>page
>doesn't specify the timeframe..)
(thats 3.2 you mean ... right? or is it 3.2.1 hmph cant remember already)
just an oppinion here...
'since cygwin gcc has its own branch and was currently being worked on based
on an unlreased 3.1.1' the release date of 3.2 is probably not going to be
the limiting factor here right? Next week 3.1.1 will go out, then 3.1
branch will be relabeled 3.2 branch, 3.2 will be relabeled 3.3(not in that
order). I am assuming almost immediately after that, the abi fixes will be
back ported... so probably 2 weeks, then some leeway for the abi backports
to cause a dozen bugs that need fixing...
And, thats probably about how long cygwin branch gcc needs testing at the
current rate anyway. (not to knock the wonderful efforts of cgf - just
keeping a simple gcc head and gnome2 head setup going on osf/1 keeps me at
my limits)
But to answer the other question, upper limit on 3.2 I guess looks to be
september, since all the bsd types were complaining that it needed to be
done by then. (well not All the bsd types ... but at least 1 of free/open
...) Think debian wanted september as well, but quite possibly i have the
wrong distribution. (debian on the brain...)
Gareth, hates literature reviews...
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -