Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sat, 13 Jul 2002 12:52:51 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Toplevel configury of src
Message-ID:	<20020713165251.GA30143@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20020709183342 DOT GA18151 AT doctormoo DOT dyndns DOT org> <0b2701c227a1$0fc34ab0$2300a8c0 AT LAPTOP>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<0b2701c227a1$0fc34ab0$2300a8c0@LAPTOP>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 09:33:42AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>> Should it mean "Don't build or use the newlib in the tree; use installed
>> libs and headers, or the ones specified with --with-libs and
>> --with-headers"?
>>
>> Should it be illegal, and give an error message?
>
>Chris is probably the person with the canonical answer. However, "illegal
>and an error", or "illegal, warn, and build newlib anyway" both make sense
>to me.

I answered this in the gcc mailing list, but I agree with Robert.  Either
of the above is fine.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -