Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 10 Jul 2002 12:38:16 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc2-2.95.3-7 uploaded
Message-ID:	<20020710163816.GE10966@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20020709061152 DOT GA7903 AT redhat DOT com> <3D2BA865 DOT 7060302 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020710045943 DOT GA28475 AT redhat DOT com> <3D2C4C1F DOT 8010002 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3D2C4C1F.8010002@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 11:00:47AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>BTW, was I correct about the C++ ABI?  Currently, the only DLL with true 
>C++ exports(*) is libncurses6++; will that be usable with gcc-3.1.1, or 
>will I need to release a new version?

I really don't know.  The ABI is different so I would assume that if you're
exporting C++ functions you'll need a new release.

And, just for fun, it looks like the ABI will change slightly in gcc 3.2,
too.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -