Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3D29AFD6.4050304@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Mon, 08 Jul 2002 11:29:26 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Available for test: gcc-3.1.1-1, gcc2-2.95.3-6, and gcc-mingw-3_1-20020516-1
References:	<20020707032010 DOT GA22463 AT redhat DOT com> <3D28FCF6 DOT 40808 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020708031758 DOT GC2440 AT redhat DOT com> <3D2911C5 DOT 8010909 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020708052729 DOT GA27657 AT redhat DOT com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:

> I don't see exactly the same errors.  I can't even compile your stuff
> with g++.  :-( It appears to be due to --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs,
> AFAICT.


Right -- I had to change #include <iostream.h> to <iostream>, etc.  I'm 
not real familiar with the source-level changes that gcc-3.x *forces* 
onto people -- but I'm not real happy about them.  The price of 
progress, I suppose.

Does anybody know of a good reference, along the lines of "What changed 
in g++ between gcc-2.95.3 and gcc-3.x"?  I'm not talking about the 
innards of gcc; but rather, user-visible changes that force me to change 
my perfectly good 2.95.3 C++ code so that it'll compile with g++ 3.x.

--Chuck


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -