Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Ph. Marek" <marek AT bmlv DOT gv DOT at>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	patch for /proc/registry read/write??
Date:	Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:48:20 +0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-Id:	<200207080848.20302.marek@bmlv.gv.at>
X-Virus-Scanned:	TAMIZ + Sophos en unizar.es
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g686p2q00377

Hello everybody,

I've just downloaded the 1.3.12-2 version and was surprised to see that the 
registry-patch (which was heavily discussed in february, if I recall 
correctly) has made it into the mainline.

But one question remains: Is there a patch for read/write support? I know that 
this starts the old problem of specifying the kind of value (dword, sz, 
multi-sz, binary, ...) but maybe this could by done by the extension 
(possibly seperated by a : as this ain't used in cygwin), so eg. name:sz or 
value:dword.

What I'd like to achieve is to use rsync on the registry - to get the registry 
into a known state.


I don't think that the naming scheme gives consistency problems - if I write a 
file name:sz it isn't guaranteed (in unix semantics) that name:dword isn't 
deleted in the same moment.


Any help appreciated!


Regards,

Phil



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -