Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3D2911C5.8010909@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Mon, 08 Jul 2002 00:15:01 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Available for test: gcc-3.1.1-1, gcc2-2.95.3-6, and gcc-mingw-3_1-20020516-1
References:	<20020707032010 DOT GA22463 AT redhat DOT com> <3D28FCF6 DOT 40808 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020708031758 DOT GC2440 AT redhat DOT com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:


> 
> Thanks for the test case.  I see these too.  I know what's going on.


I'm glad you do -- because my guess was wrong.  I see the same errors 
using regular g++ (3.1.1).


> I should have a spec file patch for this for you to try.


'Kay.


> I have to admit that the only c++ programming that I do is for cygwin,
> which is obviously a very special case, since building cygwin and its
> utilities worked fine.


<g>  Ain't that always the way?

This is why we have 'test releases'.  :-)

--Chuck



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -