Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Originating-IP:	[210.84.178.197]
Reply-To:	"Trevor Forbes" <t4bs AT hotmail DOT com>
From:	"Trevor Forbes" <t4bs AT hotmail DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<E17QTq3-0004vt-0X AT anchor-post-33 DOT mail DOT demon DOT net> <004f01c22449$91da71a0$0100a8c0 AT advent02> <20020705200207 DOT GA11696 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: /proc/uptime etc. - NtQuerySystemInformation() needs bigger structure
Date:	Sat, 6 Jul 2002 13:44:21 +0930
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Message-ID:	<OE76UOF9vJZTuG5wQ0l000026a5@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	06 Jul 2002 04:14:32.0312 (UTC) FILETIME=[A13BDF80:01C224A3]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
> This is one thing that was fixed by the -fnative-struct gcc option which
> is, unfortunately, not available in gcc 3.1.
>

Yes, but I thought that the -fnative-struct functionality moved
to -mms-bitfields in gcc 3.1? Is this correct?

Trevor



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -