Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/07/04/18:02:34
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> Hello Peter,
Hi Pavel!
> Thursday, June 27, 2002, 7:17:25 AM, you wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> PAC> Fine, so far. Now, suppose you got a notice that a new Bash was uploaded
> PAC> to the cygwin release area. So, you fire up 'setup' and tell it to
> PAC> upgrade Bash. Now, start Bash. Notice your changes don't show up anymore.
> PAC> Now, do an 'ls -al /etc/pro*'
>
> PAC> -rw-r--r-- 1 Administ None 386 May 30 19:08 /etc/profile
> PAC> -rw-r--r-- 1 Administ None 386 May 30 19:08 /etc/profile
>
> This is not real :) If you go to the /etc directory from a windows
> command prompt and type 'dir' you will see:
>
> profile
> profile.lnk
>
> The second one is your link and it is compatible with the windows type
> shortcuts.
I'm quite aware that this is a windows shortcut, but the issue is that
under the cygwin environment, you will see two, identically named, files
under these conditions.
> I know there is a way, in terms of a flag in the CYGWIN variable, to
> control the type of symlinks which cygwin creates, but I don't
> remember the details :( You can check the user's guide though.
It's not so much how the cygwin environment creates symlinks but how the
*installer* (setup.exe) creates them (or ignore them :-).
> I agree that the setup.exe behaviour in this case maybe needs an
> improvement.
I seem to recall seeing a note from Corinna saying she had an enhancement
for this, but it doesn't appear to have made it into the code.
--
Peter A. Castro <doctor AT fruitbat DOT org> or <Peter DOT Castro AT oracle DOT com>
"Cats are just autistic Dogs" -- Dr. Tony Attwood
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -