Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/07/03/01:16:10
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 08:37:57PM -0700, Randall R Schulz wrote:
>Chris,
>
>Whew! Thanks for that unequivocal reply.
>
>There's nothing worse (in the world of mailing lists) that such a hideous
>sop to brain-dead mailers.
>
>This makes me suspect that we're about due for the counterpart to the
>request for a [LIST-NAME] "Subject:" tag: having "Reply-To:" set by the
>list server.
We're actually suffering from a bout of this internally. All of our
internal mailing lists have been revamped and all of them now have the
detested [BLEURGH] subject prefix. I've been spending a lot of time
eradicating it there, too.
>Perhaps that one should be put to rest, right away, too?
Reply-To? Not no way, not no how.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -