Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 1 Jul 2002 10:57:43 +0200
From:	Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov AT syntrex DOT com>
Reply-To:	Pavel Tsekov <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Organization:	Syntrex, Inc.
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
Message-ID:	<93859369.20020701105743@syntrex.com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: New for testing binutils-20020629-1
In-Reply-To:	<20020630030010.GA12620@redhat.com>
References:	<20020630030010 DOT GA12620 AT redhat DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0

Hello Christopher,

Sunday, June 30, 2002, 5:00:11 AM, you wrote:

CF> The strange problems that people were mentioning when building cygwin
CF> with the previous test version of binutils seem to be gone in the CVS
CF> sources, so I've regenerated a new test version of binutils.  It should
CF> be on mirrors soon.

CF> Please check it out.  Send problem reports here.

I've just built the snapshot from 30 July using the new binutils and
so far everything seems to work just fine :)

Thanks! :)


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -