Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<0a2701c21c7e$a61646d0$6132bc3e@BABEL>
From:	"Conrad Scott" <Conrad DOT Scott AT dsl DOT pipex DOT com>
To:	"Harig, Mark A." <maharig AT idirect DOT net>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<BADF3C947A1BD54FBA75C70C241B0B9E10AA45 AT ex02 DOT idirect DOT net>
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.3.11-3
Date:	Tue, 25 Jun 2002 20:29:38 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

"Harig, Mark A." <maharig AT idirect DOT net> wrote:
> The "solution"?  I added step 1a. "sleep 1":
>
>   1. generate assembly language from c code
>   1a. sleep 1
>   2. assemble the .asm into .o
>   3. archive the .o into .a
>
> Should it be considered part of the standard Cygwin build
> of 'make' that the '--disable-nsec-timestamps' be used
> during configuration?

There has been (AFAIK) no release of make since the patch for
sub-second timestamps, so you will be using a version that has
(effectively) been compiled with --disable-nsec-timestamps (unless
you've compiled a copy for yourself recently).

Has this problem just started? or have you been seeing this for some
time? (which will help understand whether it's related to sub-second
timestamps at all).

// Conrad




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -