Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<08d801c2192e$f17fa6a0$6132bc3e@BABEL>
From:	"Conrad Scott" <Conrad DOT Scott AT dsl DOT pipex DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<20020619062155 DOT GA22072 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: binutils-20020616-1 test version available
Date:	Fri, 21 Jun 2002 15:21:31 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

"Christopher Faylor" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
> I put up a new version of binutils a couple of days ago as a "test"
> package.  This is just a refresh against the 2002-06-16 version of
> binutils from CVS.  It has many cygwin/windows specific fixes.
>
> Please check it out and report any problems to cygwin AT cygwin DOT com.

I've just installed this and done a clean re-build of the cvs sources.
The result is a non-working system. Cygwin processes die very early
on. Just to confirm, this is the same code that worked fine when
compiled with the previous binutils release.

I realise this is a me-too of Pavel and Nicholas's comments, but I
know that at least one of those two is working on a non-NT platform:
so this is a (just to confirm it) win2k failure report.

I'll try and have a look at what's happening (using the mingw gdb I
suppose) but that'll have to be tomorrow, since I've used up all my
time for today.

// Conrad




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -