Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Bernard A Badger" <bab AT vx DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Re[2]: Rebase 1.5-1: Causes invalid page fault
Date:	Wed, 19 Jun 2002 09:44:10 -0400
Message-ID:	<INEKLKBFCDBPKMKAJLMDOEHJCEAA.bab@vx.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
Importance:	Normal
In-Reply-To:	<776628761.20020618224110@gmx.net>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com]On Behalf
> Of Pavel Tsekov
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 4:41 PM
> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: Re[2]: Rebase 1.5-1: Causes invalid page fault
> 
> 
> JT> On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 06:04:31PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> >> You printed just the first argument.  There is a total of 11 arguments
> >> to this function.
> >> 
> >> BOOL ReBaseImage(
> >>   PSTR CurrentImageName,  
[SNIP]
> >>   ULONG_PTR *OldImageBase,  
> JT>          ^^^^
> JT>          ****
> >>   ULONG *NewImageSize,  
> >>   ULONG_PTR *NewImageBase,  
> JT>          ^^^^
> JT>          ****
> >>   ULONG TimeStamp        
> >> );
> 
> JT> The ULONG_PTR above is causing me some concern.  Note that the above
> JT> signature does *not* agree with the header file (either MinGW or MSVC)
> JT> and I cannot find the definition of ULONG_PTR.  Is the above a typo in
> JT> the MSDN or are OldImageBase and NewImageBase really suppose to be a
> JT> pointer to pointer?
> 
> The above is from help library that is coming with the downloadable
> Platform SDK. It is dated November, 2001.
> 
> I just grepped /usr/include/w32api:
> 
> ./basetsd.h:100:typedef  unsigned long ULONG_PTR, *PULONG_PTR;
> 
> So it is not a pointer to pointer. They have chosen a strange name
> though :)

Which "it"?  I thought the concern was whether 

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -