Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<20020614185934.51146.qmail@web21006.mail.yahoo.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Nicholas Wourms <nwourms AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject:	Re: The Korn Shell [was: Re: What's Up With That (KSH)?]
To:	"Gregory W. Bond" <bond AT research DOT att DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<3D09F7B4.D3DDE36A@research.att.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0

--- "Gregory W. Bond" <bond AT research DOT att DOT com> wrote:
> First permit me to correct a common misconception: AT&T Labs Research is
> not Bell Labs. The latter is the R&D arm of Lucent. Lucent was spun off
> from AT&T in 1996/7. When the spin off took place,
> researchers in the original AT&T Bell Labs chose to go to Lucent Bell
> Labs (Lucent got to keep the 'Bell Labs' name) or to the newly formed
> AT&T Labs Research. Dave Korn chose AT&T Labs Research.

Boooo... Damn The DOJ, Judge Green, and The Modified Final Judgement for
splintering AT&T (which inevitably let to the lucent divestiture).  Now we
have all these other stupid phone companies providing crappy service :-p.

> I also wanted to corroborate  what Joe said about the relationship
> between Cygwin and U/Win and add that Dave's goals in creating U/Win
> included high performance and transparent integration of Win32 and
> Unix programs. In my opinion, Cygwin does not do as well in these two
> areas. On the other hand, Cygwin is superior to U/Win in the number of
> Unix apps that have been ported and are supported.

This is true, however there are a few posix functions which U/WIN has and
cygwin lacks :-(.  However the general acceptance of Cygwin in many
projects does give it the edge up.  Now if only there was a full fort of
glibc...
 
> With regards to ksh for Cygwin: a new version of the source and
> pre-compiled binaries have been posted at 
> http://www.research.att.com/sw/download that should fix a problem I
> reported to Dave and Glenn
> that caused ksh to break on text mounted directories.
> 
> It's great to have a real ksh for Cygwin!

I completely agree!  Down with the imposters!  Long live David Korn!

Cheers,
Nicholas


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -