Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/06/14/07:27:10
On Thursday 13 Jun 02, Nicholas Wourms writes:
>
> --- Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 08:35:26PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> > >The doco is outdated, all those functions are implemented.
> >
> > Anyone interested in updating the documentation?
> >
> > At the very least we should remove the "unimplemented" tags.
>
> Do patches against htdocs belong here or in cygwin-patches?
What documentation are you talking about? The "User's Guide", "API
Reference" or FAQ? In each case, one updates the source in winsup/doc
(sgml for ug and api, texinfo for the faq), and generates the contents
of htdocs from that. For these, you don't patch htdocs directly.
I see the FAQ needs updating w.r.t. these calls, and I've already got
a backlog of FAQ updates to apply, so I'll see what I can do about it
this weekend. I can't do it during the workday, unfortunately.
Regards,
David
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -