Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 12 Jun 2002 08:32:39 -0400
From:	rich-paul AT rich-paul DOT net
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Am I missing something?
Message-ID:	<20020612083239.A11421@monster.rich-paul.net>
References:	<20020612002933 DOT A10609 AT monster DOT rich-paul DOT net> <20020612052910 DOT GA21519 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.16i
In-Reply-To:	<20020612052910.GA21519@redhat.com>; from cgf-cygwin@cygwin.com on Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 01:29:10AM -0400
X-Operating-System:	Linux monster 2.4.17-SMPs

Sorry, I guess my searches missed the stack trace, as it was in an
attachment.  And I didn't thing to search on 'miserably'.  *G*

Anyway, I'll switch over to the CVS tree.  And I'll try to get the
cultural stuff right, this is very differant in that respect from
developing as a consultant.

On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 01:29:10AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 12:29:33AM -0400, linguist-cygwin AT rich-paul DOT net wrote:
> >I had to change wincap.{cc,h} in order to get the 6/9/2002 snapshot to
> >work for me.  Without that, every cygwin program would segfault before
> >entering main, due to trying to access wincapc in the pthreads
> >initialization code.
> >
> >It seems odd, however, that there's been no discussion of such a
> >problem on this list or the cygwin developer's list.
> 
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-06/msg00528.html
> 
> >Thus my question: have I missed something?  Or am I the only one trying
> >snapshots?
> >
> >Anyway, my patch is here, FWIW:
> 
> I appreciate the fact that you are trying snapshots but you really
> should check that you are actually running the *latest* snapshot.
> 
> I also very much appreciate the fact that you're providing patches but,
> for the patches to be useful, it's usually safer to generate them
> against cvs.  If you're rebuilding cygwin, you'll see fixes much more
> quickly if you update from cvs.
> 
> Anyway, in this case, the problem was discovered and fixed on
> 2002-06-10.
> 
> cgf
> --
> Please do not send me personal email with cygwin questions.
> Use the resources at http://cygwin.com/ .
> 
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> 

-- 
Got freedom?  Vote Libertarian:  http://www.lp.org

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -