Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT syncretize DOT net>
To:	<fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: New setup.exe v.2.249.2.2
Date:	Wed, 12 Jun 2002 20:01:17 +1000
Message-ID:	<008901c211f8$184c9970$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
Importance:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
In-Reply-To:	<000701c21190$9a301380$af7b1f3e@Fergus>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com 
> [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com] On Behalf Of 
> fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net
> Sent: Wednesday, 12 June 2002 7:40 AM
> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Cc: fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net
> Subject: New setup.exe v.2.249.2.2
> 
> 
> Both http://cygwin.com/setup.exe and
> http://cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.249.2.2.exe come up with
> v.2.249.2.2 as their ID when they are started, but their md5sum's are
> different. Is the first-named the later version and therefore 
> the one to
> try?

They are the same. The md5 difference is because one has been
recompressed with UPX, as part of the release process.

Rob


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -