Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 10 Jun 2002 17:53:15 +0200
From:	Thomas Baker <thomas DOT baker AT bi DOT fhg DOT de>
To:	"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Mailcap and Cygwin/Mutt 1.2.5i
Message-ID:	<20020610175315.A2164@mail.gmd.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	Thomas Baker <thomas DOT baker AT bi DOT fhg DOT de>,
	"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20020609114821 DOT A2224 AT LEPIDUS> <20020607145647 DOT A160 AT LEPIDUS> <20020607133143 DOT GB1408 AT NBOF> <20020607162934 DOT D1872 AT LEPIDUS> <20020607150006 DOT GB604 AT NBOF> <20020609114821 DOT A2224 AT LEPIDUS> <20020610110850 DOT A2132 AT mail DOT gmd DOT de> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20020610104439 DOT 04c869a0 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To:	<5.1.0.14.0.20020610104439.04c869a0@pop.ma.ultranet.com>; from lhall@rfk.com on Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 10:45:56AM -0400

On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 10:45:56AM -0400, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
> At 05:09 AM 6/10/2002, Thomas Baker wrote:
> >2) A weakly related question: My .fetchmailrc is supposed to
> >   have permissions of 710 "at a maximum", but chmod 710
> >   .fetchmailrc (under Cygwin) doesn't seem to change the
> >   permissions at all.
> 
> See:
> Why doesn't chmod work?
> http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_4.html#SEC45

Hmm, I see...  The recommendation in SEC45, when a workaround
is required, is to modify the application's source code.
Perhaps this would need to be done for a Cygwin build of
Fetchmail so that it wouldn't make this unmeetable demand?

> >3) Another WRQ: On the first tries, procmail delivers mail
> >   without From-lines, and I figured out that this has
> >   something to do with the %F and %T "escapes" but have not
> >   found any documentation on these things at all (other than a
> >   "man fetchmail" warning that they are potentially unsafe).
> 
> Check the email archives for this one.  It was discussed in the last
> few weeks.

Bingo.  (The search engine didn't like "%F", so I downloaded
the last six months of postings and fgrep'd; figured I'd need
to consult them anyway...:-)

Thank you!
Tom

-- 
Dr. Thomas Baker                                Thomas DOT Baker AT bi DOT fhg DOT de
Institutszentrum Schloss Birlinghoven          mobile +49-171-408-5784
Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft                          work +49-30-8109-9027
53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany                     fax +49-2241-14-2619

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -