delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT syncretize DOT net> |
To: | "'Ralf Habacker'" <Ralf DOT Habacker AT freenet DOT de>, |
"'Nicholas Wourms'" <nwourms AT yahoo DOT com>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> | |
Cc: | <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> |
Subject: | RE: SysV Ipc shm revisited...A new solution |
Date: | Sat, 8 Jun 2002 08:29:24 +1000 |
Message-ID: | <002101c20e72$c78f40b0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 (Normal) |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 |
Importance: | Normal |
In-Reply-To: | <001c01c20e58$33d7d950$316307d5@BRAMSCHE> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Ralf Habacker [mailto:Ralf DOT Habacker AT freenet DOT de] > Sent: Saturday, 8 June 2002 5:19 AM > To: Robert Collins; 'Nicholas Wourms'; cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Cc: cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu > Subject: RE: SysV Ipc shm revisited...A new solution > > > >Robert Collins wrote: > > > Already provided. What will happen when the 64 bit key is > exported is > > that fresh cygipc linked programs will fail, but existing > programs will > > still work correctly. If something like ipcdaemon2.exe exists - OR - > > cygipc is re-released as a 64-bit version, then new links > will succeed > > (but at the possible cost of breaking old binaries). > > > Why must this be ? Could not the released 64-bit version only > use the most > significant long word of key_t, so that it is compatible to > the old binaries and > can use the 64 bit key_t definition ? It wouldn't be compatible with the old binaries because the signature would still be wrong, and this would lead to immediate crashes when it tried to pop to much off the stack. Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |