Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<02cd01c20e3e$d2397fa0$42a18c09@wdg.uk.ibm.com>
From:	"Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT syncretize DOT net>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<009c01c20e37$d925d2c0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Subject:	Re: Crashing setup.exe
Date:	Fri, 7 Jun 2002 17:17:29 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT syncretize DOT net> wrote:
>> I appreciate you are trying to prevent aimless discussion,
>> but setup's cache
>> _cannot_ be a black box.
> 
> I realize this. In fact it's not - and I've not suggested it be a black
> box... There are other bits of software - like the setup cache cleaner -
> that are very useful. They are intimately linked with setup's treatment
> of the cache however, and will have to change as it changes. What I'm
> trying to avoid is setup.exe's users getting the impression that there
> is any manipulation needed for setup to operate correctly.

Yes.

Max.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -