Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"robertc" <robert DOT collins AT syncretize DOT net>
To:	"'Ralf Hauser'" <hauser AT acm DOT org>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: bitkeeper cygwin messed up cygwin terminal setting for tcsh, lynx: dumb terminal?
Date:	Sat, 8 Jun 2002 00:52:00 +1000
Message-ID:	<009101c20e32$e18c57e0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
In-reply-to:	<adpp9q$dkj$1@main.gmane.org>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Importance:	Normal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com 
> [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com] On Behalf Of Ralf Hauser
> Sent: Friday, 7 June 2002 6:01 PM
> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: bitkeeper cygwin messed up cygwin terminal setting 
> for tcsh, lynx: dumb terminal?
> 
> 
> When I downloaded bitkeeper, it installed a stripped-down (no 
> clue whether
> it was the most recent) version of cygwin on top of the version I had
> already installed.

I thought bitkeeper was proprietary. Whats the deal with them installing
cygwin?

Rob


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -