Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 7 Jun 2002 11:05:49 +0200
From:	Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov AT syntrex DOT com>
Reply-To:	Pavel Tsekov <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Organization:	Syntrex, Inc.
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
Message-ID:	<193840612.20020607110549@syntrex.com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re[2]: 1.3.11(CVS): Possible bug involving temp file generation
In-Reply-To:	<13925672855.20020606182237@s<20020606234917.GC11320@redhat.com>
References:	<20020605132012 DOT 8086 DOT qmail AT web21002 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
	<12220356170 DOT 20020605154358 AT syntrex DOT com> <20020605150849 DOT GF15167 AT redhat DOT com>
	<17118445663 DOT 20020606162210 AT syntrex DOT com>
	<20020606165907 DOT F22789 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <13925672855 DOT 20020606182237 AT s
	<20020606234917 DOT GC11320 AT redhat DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0

Hello Christopher,

Friday, June 07, 2002, 1:49:17 AM, you wrote:

CF> I should reiterate that this code is *only* called when a cygwin process
CF> is invoked from a non-cygwin process with stdin/stdout/stderr redirected
CF> to a disk file.

CF> It has nothing to do with temp file creation or normal file creation.

I am aware of this fact - explaining me once is sufficient (in most
cases) :)

The original post introduced some confusion. While explaining how
to reproduce the problem with the temp file, another bug was
introduced - the STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION in patch (from the
strace.log). I was trying to catch this one.

Check http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-06/msg00278.html - at the
bottom lines.

And clearly this post of mine,
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-06/msg00210.html, is *WRONG*. I assume
your changes in v 1.92 of dtable.cc fixed the 'Bad file
number' problem.

It's cool that now both of the problems are fixed! :)


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -