Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 4 Jun 2002 15:29:13 -0400
From:	rich-paul AT rich-paul DOT net
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Building cygwin1.dll and mknetrel
Message-ID:	<20020604152913.A18096@monster.rich-paul.net>
References:	<4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20020528122339 DOT 0260f7f0 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <20020528190238 DOT A22088 AT monster DOT rich-paul DOT net> <20020528232930 DOT GA18281 AT redhat DOT com> <20020529091728 DOT D22088 AT monster DOT rich-paul DOT net> <20020529143618 DOT GA2808 AT redhat DOT com> <20020602004747 DOT A10315 AT monster DOT rich-paul DOT net> <20020602062824 DOT GA1808 AT redhat DOT com> <20020602072107 DOT B10865 AT monster DOT rich-paul DOT net> <20020603053325 DOT A13720 AT monster DOT rich-paul DOT net> <20020604050101 DOT GA12031 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.16i
In-Reply-To:	<20020604050101.GA12031@redhat.com>; from cgf@redhat.com on Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 01:01:01AM -0400
X-Operating-System:	Linux monster 2.4.17-SMPs

> Yes, I have never run this under cygwin, actually.  It was intended as a
> cross-compilation environment.  I'm surprised that it works on cygwin
> with so few changes.
Great work, my shell scripts require alot of TLC and SSH b4 they work on
more than one platform.  <G>

> You should be able to say "mknetrel cygwin" to have it build the latest version.
> Again, I'm surprised that it would actually work with explicit versions.

I'm sorry, I didn't use explicit versions when calling mknetrel.  I was
saying that the wildcards in the shell snippets above (e.g. cd
cygwin*/winsup) would break if there was, for example, more than one dir
called 'cygwin*'.  Actually, it's worse than I thought, I didn't put a
dash b4 the glob, so even a package called cygwinfoo-2-3 would break the
cd!

-- 
Got freedom?  Vote Libertarian:  http://www.lp.org

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -