Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<5.1.0.14.0.20020603144303.0348bb90@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
X-Sender:	lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com
Date:	Mon, 03 Jun 2002 14:52:04 -0400
To:	"Barnhart, Kevin" <Kevin DOT Barnhart AT echostar DOT com>,
	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
From:	"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
Subject:	Re: run batch w/o .bat?
In-Reply-To:	<C69F6A9E1E1F5A488C58B168F0875F4005BD9FF1@riv-exch1.echosta
	r.com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 02:27 PM 6/3/2002, Barnhart, Kevin wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>I'm a new user to Cygwin, and although I'm sure someone has asked this
>question before, I'll ask it again (since I sure can't seem to find it in
>the FAQ or the archives).


The email archives is the place to look and look hard for something like 
this.  I know wading through the results is hard.  Still, I found the
answer to this one by simply searching for "batch".  Granted, the number
of matches was 757 but the exact answer (below) was the fourth match.  
Don't be scared off by the number of results.  Look closely at
the first 10 or so and you'll likely find something useful if not the 
answer.


>How would I go about running my batch files in  bash so that I don't have to
>add the .bat extension?

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-03/msg01847.html



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -