delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/06/03/14:46:06

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id: <200206031842.g53Ig9X51949@mailserver4.hushmail.com>
From: auto350388 AT hushmail DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: sig_t def\'n
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 11:42:09 -0700

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 03 Jun 2002 11:35:07 -0400, "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com> wrote:
>At 10:39 AM 6/3/2002, auto350388 AT hushmail DOT com wrote:
>>"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com> wrote:
>>>auto350388 AT hushmail DOT com wrote:
>>>>In which file might I find the definition of sig_t?
>>>
>>>
>>># grep -r sig_t *
>>
>>:-) Tried that, but could not find it. I wondered if there were some package
>>whose source code I do not have installed which defines it.
>
>
>I guess you missed my point.  I didn't find it either.

Yup :)

>I was simply trying
>to show you the way you could answer your original question (and any
>similar questions).

I do not have all the cygwin bits and pieces, and even less source code,
installed.

>If you can't find a file with this definition when
>searching the Cygwin installation, you can assume the definition doesn't
>exist.

See above...

>>>Want to provide a patch?
>>
>>Ah, but what to patch, that is the question :-)
>
>
>Well, start by determining where the definition should go.  I couldn't find
>sig_t on my Red Hat 7 installation nor in SUSV2 so I can't help with any
>specifics.  But then again, maybe that route is incorrect.  You might want
>to review the need for the type and see if that helps you determine where
>this type should be defined.  Perhaps looking for it in Cygwin is not the
>correct approach.

I'll have a noodle about, then. There was no point in going into deep analysis
of it if the definition existed 'somewhere' already. Thanks.

Hush provide the worlds most secure, easy to use online applications - which solution is right for you?
HushMail Secure Email http://www.hushmail.com/
HushDrive Secure Online Storage http://www.hushmail.com/hushdrive/
Hush Business - security for your Business http://www.hush.com/
Hush Enterprise - Secure Solutions for your Enterprise http://www.hush.com/

Looking for a good deal on a domain name? http://www.hush.com/partners/offers.cgi?id=domainpeople

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Hush 2.1
Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com

wl8EARECAB8FAjz7uUwYHGF1dG8zNTAzODhAaHVzaG1haWwuY29tAAoJEFBtZy2E0yuq
mcoAn3F+VnN+extK5Qu06WZPOxamepbzAKC8fzHQqNAF+F0RUYL/9WFeLRvTow==
=h7lx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019