delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/05/30/15:06:34

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Originating-IP: [209.131.32.108]
From: "Johnny D" <niceguy303 AT hotmail DOT com>
To: lhall AT rfk DOT com, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Big Performance issue with CYGWIN 1.3.10 on Win2k - Urgent help reqd!
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 19:06:06 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <F496axs1UYubNvvg4YL00012757@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 May 2002 19:06:07.0202 (UTC) FILETIME=[0D638C20:01C2080D]

Larry,
The issue is that strace output is too voluminous and os too intrusive. 
strace itself brings down the performance of the server I built. I tried a 
Dec 2001 pckage of cygwin and got the same results, so my guess is that the 
problem manifested itself somewhere b/w Dec 2000 and
Dec 2001.

Are there ftp archives of the older packages I can try. Please help me out 
here as I have really bad deadlines that I have too meet :)

THanks
-Johnny

>From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
>To: "Johnny D" <niceguy303 AT hotmail DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
>Subject: Re: Big Performance issue with CYGWIN 1.3.10 on Win2k - Urgent  
>help reqd!
>Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 10:18:51 -0400
>
>At 11:42 PM 5/29/2002, Johnny D wrote:
>
> >I am not sure when this bug might have been introduced. I have an app 
>which deals with multiple socket descriptors for reads and writes. It uses 
>the select() function call from cygwin library. I took the same source code 
>- compiled it with a newer installaion  of Cygwin (1.3.10 based). I see 
>that the select call seems to be getting stuck at points and so the 
>performance of my server has dropped thru the floor.
> >I dont have an older installation currently that I can use and I couldnt 
>figure out how to get an older version of your package from the cygwin 
>website. I urgently need to get this resolved. Prefer to have the complete 
>Cygwin package dating close to Dec 2000 (whcih is the last best known 
>version of Cygwin that is known to work fine for me). Can someone point me 
>to the right location from which I can install the same?
> >Or if this is a known issue, does anyone have a patch I could use?
>
>
>It's unlikely that you'll find a year and a half old Cygwin DLL lying 
>around.
>If you do, you're welcome to use it but this list can't respond to 
>questions
>or problems with it.  You're better off from a "support" standpoint to try
>to determine why the current DLL causes you this problem.  Perhaps an
>strace of your execution will help you see what internal operations are
>involved when things "slow down" for you.
>
>
>
>Larry Hall               lhall AT rfk DOT com
>RFK Partners, Inc.       http://www.rfk.com
>838 Washington Street    (508) 560-1285 - cell phone
>Holliston, MA 01746      (508) 893-9889 - FAX
>                          (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office (messages only)
>


_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019