Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning:	calypso.arrow: stuart owned process doing -bs
Date:	Wed, 29 May 2002 20:09:01 +0100 (BST)
From:	Stuart Brady <sbrady AT ntlworld DOT com>
X-X-Sender:	stuart AT calypso DOT arrow
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	RE: trivial mkpasswd defect
In-Reply-To:	<INEKLKBFCDBPKMKAJLMDEEIOCDAA.bab@vx.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0205291834270.1287-100000@calypso.arrow>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Wed, 29 May 2002, Bernard A Badger wrote:

> I hope you mean that '-?' will work, not that '-?' will be taken out of the
> usage.

Shouldn't it be -h rather than -?, for the same reason that -* would be 
a bad idea? What's wrong with --help anyway?
-- 
Stuart Brady


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -