Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<4.3.1.2.20020528213941.02695238@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
X-Sender:	lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com
Date:	Tue, 28 May 2002 21:53:17 -0400
To:	rich-paul AT rich-paul DOT net, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Building cygwin1.dll
In-Reply-To:	<20020528190238.A22088@monster.rich-paul.net>
References:	<4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20020528122339 DOT 0260f7f0 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
	<000001c204b3$f2b01bc0$0200a8c0 AT sknet01>
	<000001c204b3$f2b01bc0$0200a8c0 AT sknet01>
	<20020528120346 DOT B21064 AT monster DOT rich-paul DOT net>
	<4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20020528122339 DOT 0260f7f0 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 07:02 PM 5/28/2002, rich-paul AT rich-paul DOT net wrote:
>I meant that what I have built, I did not install through
>setup.exe ...


Ah-ha!  You're the one!  We can't allow this subversion!  You will be 
forever banished!! ;-)

I'd hope that anyone who's capable enough to build Cygwin from source 
would also be capable enough to handle basic configuration issues that
setup helps to automate.  I think people can use their best judgement 
about asking questions in this regard.  But I'd be surprised to see 
any thoughtful question about building Cygwin shot-down based on the 
premise that it's off-topic because setup hasn't been used.  I think 
the person involved here has a different goal than those who are just
looking to install Cygwin.  This list can accommodate both of these 
"types" IMO.


>The faq entry is good as far as it goes, but generally there are
>problems. With my current download I believe they involved a
>present but empty directory (perhaps windows32api?), and a couple
>of other things.  I just removed the subtrees that didn't built,
>and was able to patch and build what I needed.
>
>
>On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 12:28:04PM -0400, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
> > At 12:03 PM 5/28/2002, rich-paul AT rich-paul DOT net wrote:
> > >First, a question for the list:  Are problems with building
> > >cygwin on-topic for this list?  I know y'all don't like custom
> > >setups, and custom building may be worse!
> > 
> > 
> > I'm not sure what "custom building" means but issues with building 
> > the Cygwin DLL are on-topic for this list.  Generally speaking though,
> > the process should be as described in the FAQ entry:
> > 
> > 
> > How do I rebuild the tools on my NT box?
> > http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_4.html#SEC102
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Larry Hall                              lhall AT rfk DOT com
> > RFK Partners, Inc.                      http://www.rfk.com
> > 838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
> > Holliston, MA 01746                     (508) 893-9889 - FAX
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> > Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> > Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> > FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> > 
>
>-- 
>Got freedom?  Vote Libertarian:  http://www.lp.org
>
>--
>Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
>Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
>FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -