Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 27 May 2002 13:50:36 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: You ready for our blind date? Do you even know?!?
Message-ID:	<20020527175036.GD21314@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<F239CD897B4CD611825600508BE70AC212AC0D AT FRUITMACHINE DOT brighton DOT climax DOT co DOT uk>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<F239CD897B4CD611825600508BE70AC212AC0D@FRUITMACHINE.brighton.climax.co.uk>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 10:06:59AM +0100, Mark Sheppard wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 08:39:25PM +0200, Gerrit P.  Haase wrote:
>>>
>>>Did you got messages from SpamCop?
>>
>>Not this time, no.  It has happened in the past.
>
>If you went to the SpamCop report and clicked "innocent bystander" I'm
>pretty sure that you won't hear from SpamCop again (on the address you
>use for the admin & tech contacts for cygwin.com) even if people don't
>strip the URL from reported spam.

Yes, I *am* capable of reading information on a web page.

The point is that I don't want people reporting the cygwin mailing list
as a spam source.  Apparently this is a very hard concept for people to
understand.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -