Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sun, 26 May 2002 21:19:42 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Tcl
Message-ID:	<20020527011942.GB15710@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<3CF17853 DOT 9050507 AT cox DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3CF17853.9050507@cox.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 08:05:39PM -0400, David A. Cobb wrote:
>Background: I build a gcc 3.1 -- I don't yet know how successfully. 
>When I tried MAKE CHECK things didn't go too well because, I guess, the 
>test suite depends on Tcl (and probably other stuff).  
>So, I search around on my disk.  Hey!  Since installing Cygwin SWIG 
>there's /lots/ of xxx.tcl files anyway.  But there's still no tcl.exe.  
>
>Scratching my head and remembering I asked about Tcl once before and got 
>curtly informed there was no current work with a port, I wasn't 
>surprised it's not  here.  If I've misunderstood the situation, someone 
>_please_ set me straight before I dive into deep water.

http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-cat.cgi?file=tcltk/tcltk-20001125-1&grep=tcl

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -