Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/05/23/15:25:24
Hi Chuck,
>I know this. However, right now I do not want to do that --
>not because
> I'm a control freak or anything, but I just haven't figured out the
>best way to handle commits from multiple developers (authorization,
>approval (reversals?) etc). I'm usually pretty responsive to updates
>and such (no complaints so far) and really, there are only three
>contributors other than me -- there haven't really been a whole lot of
>updates to deal with.
>
>I don't WANT cygutils to grow so large that we need multiple approved
>committers and "community standards" and suchlike. For now, the three
>people who this actually affects can continue to send me their
>patches,
>and I'll apply them. If my latency gets too large, or I hear
>complaints
>from those three poeple, then I'll re-evaluate...
I thought there are already more submaintainers and with David the package
is obviously growing. Basically I don't like very much posting diffs to my
own utilities and keeping my own CVS developer repository. Additionally I
supposed that your inbox is quite full enough with such kind of mails
(regarding the number of Cygwin packages you're maintaining). But - as I
said - it was just a proposal open for discussion. Finally these utilities
are not THAT important anyway :)
Regards,
Jorg
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -