Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	RE: Re[2]: setup-2.243 Crash / Install from Local Directory / WinXP
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
content-class:	urn:content-classes:message
Date:	Thu, 23 May 2002 19:50:10 +1000
Message-ID:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C6147@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	"Pavel Tsekov" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, "Cliff Hones" <cliff AT aonix DOT co DOT uk>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g4N9uiu08929

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pavel Tsekov [mailto:ptsekov AT syntrex DOT com] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:28 AM
> To: Cliff Hones
> Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: Re[2]: setup-2.243 Crash / Install from Local 
> Directory / WinXP
> 
> 
> Hello Cliff,
> 
> Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 4:22:57 PM, you wrote:
> 
> CH> Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> wrote:
> 
> >> C'mon Max, you *know* I need more detail than that.
> >> 
> >> Install from Local works fine here. Even though it's only 
> a snapshot, 
> >> I wasn't aware of any -bugs- in the release.
> 
> CH> Why doesn't 
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-> 05/msg01210.html count 
> CH> 
> as a bug?  Is it because it was on W98?
> 
> I've been tracing the exception with a disassembler - I'm not 
> quite positve why exactly does the fault occur, but I can say 
> for sure that it was caused from some code inside 
> LogSingleton or LogFile classes. Maybe an exception being 
> thrown from one of these... I can't be sure because it seems 
> that the source provided along with the binary snapshot is 
> not exactly the same as the one from which the binary was 
> compiled... Robert, can you confirm/deny this assumption ?

The source provided is the source that binary was created from. I use
the build script I posted to create snapshots, and it uses make dist to
create the source package.

Rob

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -