delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Subject: | RE: version 1.3 10, problem with gunzip.exe |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 |
content-class: | urn:content-classes:message |
Date: | Wed, 22 May 2002 19:47:37 +1000 |
Message-ID: | <FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C6135@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au> |
X-MS-Has-Attach: | |
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: | |
From: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> |
To: | "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g4M9tSA11235 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) [mailto:lhall AT rfk DOT com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:00 AM > I guess I can see some value to having the symlinks that > setup generates be windows shortcuts. The obvious plus is > that symbolic links to executables and other files should be > understood in non-Cygwin shells. Still, while this is an > advantage for those packages that make using of symbolic links for > things like this, it's unclear to me that making such a > change would result in > something intuitive, since the user would need to add ".lnk" to the > executable name ("gunzip.exe.lnk" in this case) to get it to > work in an non- Cygwin shell. But probably it's a plus > overall since using the Windows shortcuts at least allows for > the use of the symlink in non-Cygwin shells, despite the > clunkiness of its usage. In the current case, this is not true. > > There's a nice bit of philosophy for you, don't you think?! ;-) Yes :}. We initially left setup unchanged because the long term existence of windows shortcuts wasn't clear, and we had to be backward compatible. I think we are far enough beyond that that we could accept patches to alter the behaviour. Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |