| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Subject: | RE: version 1.3 10, problem with gunzip.exe |
| X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 |
| content-class: | urn:content-classes:message |
| Date: | Wed, 22 May 2002 19:47:37 +1000 |
| Message-ID: | <FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C6135@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au> |
| X-MS-Has-Attach: | |
| X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: | |
| From: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> |
| To: | "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g4M9tSA11235 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) [mailto:lhall AT rfk DOT com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:00 AM
> I guess I can see some value to having the symlinks that
> setup generates be windows shortcuts. The obvious plus is
> that symbolic links to executables and other files should be
> understood in non-Cygwin shells. Still, while this is an
> advantage for those packages that make using of symbolic links for
> things like this, it's unclear to me that making such a
> change would result in
> something intuitive, since the user would need to add ".lnk" to the
> executable name ("gunzip.exe.lnk" in this case) to get it to
> work in an non- Cygwin shell. But probably it's a plus
> overall since using the Windows shortcuts at least allows for
> the use of the symlink in non-Cygwin shells, despite the
> clunkiness of its usage. In the current case, this is not true.
>
> There's a nice bit of philosophy for you, don't you think?! ;-)
Yes :}. We initially left setup unchanged because the long term
existence of windows shortcuts wasn't clear, and we had to be backward
compatible. I think we are far enough beyond that that we could accept
patches to alter the behaviour.
Rob
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |