Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 17 May 2002 08:18:15 +0100
Message-ID:	<7344-Fri17May2002081815+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
From:	David Starks-Browning <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	"Jim George" <jim DOT george AT blueyonder DOT co DOT uk>
Cc:	"Cygwin" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	two installs one works; one doesn't
In-Reply-To:	<00ae01c1fd1c$72a0b190$23b5fea9@GEORGE.CO.UK>
References:	<00ae01c1fd1c$72a0b190$23b5fea9 AT GEORGE DOT CO DOT UK>

On Thursday 16 May 02, Jim George writes:
> I have cygwin, cygwin-xfree, and postgres installed on two Win2K systems.
> The first is a W2K Professional on a Toshiba Laptop, the second is a W2K
> Advanced Server on a desktop.
> 
> The first works like grease lightening, the second runs like a dog in xfree
> and postgres (indeed I can't even run initDB).

Both have the same anti-virus software setup?

I notice massive performance differences depending on which product I
use and how it's configured.

David


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -