Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3CE49442.8050409@elegant.nl>
Date:	Fri, 17 May 2002 07:25:22 +0200
From:	Gilgamesh Nootebos <Gilgamesh DOT Nootebos AT elegant DOT nl>
Reply-To:	cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Organization:	The Elegant Group
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020417
X-Accept-Language:	nl, en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: umount doesn't umount
References:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C60EE AT itdomain003 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>

Robert Collins wrote:
> 
> ':'s on NTFS allow alternate streams. Read up on that before
> speculating, and please remember that a single test case (your local
> test) only shows the results for that exact configuration.
> 

I just refreshed my memory with 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/fileio/fsys_7qwj.asp 
and 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/fileio/fsys_5okz.asp 
which confirmed what I suspected and you say: NTFS might allow it but 
Windows doesn't.

That is why I mentioned my systems specification with the testcase. I 
just forgot to say it was really NTFS and not FAT32 that's used.

Gilgamesh

-- 
Gilgamesh Nootebos (Elegant Relational Development)
@: Gilgamesh DOT Nootebos AT elegant DOT nl
T: +31 36 54 77 100


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -