Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<20020515210242.94866.qmail@web10501.mail.yahoo.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 May 2002 14:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Rick Rankin <rick_rankin AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Circular symlinks in terminfo-5.2-2.tar.bz2
To:	Rick Rankin <rick_rankin AT yahoo DOT com>,
	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0

--- Rick Rankin <rick_rankin AT yahoo DOT com> wrote:
> 
> In short, I'm not at all sure how it worked before. I need to look at the
> source for less to understand how it determines that a terminal is "not fully
> functional" and proceed from there.
> 

Well, it seems that the problem is specific to the way Cygwin's distribution of
less was compiled. The Cygwin binary was compiled without ncurses:

$ cygcheck less.exe
Found: .\less.exe
Found: C:\cygwin\bin\less.exe
.\less.exe
  .\cygwin1.dll
    C:\WINNT\System32\KERNEL32.dll
      C:\WINNT\System32\NTDLL.DLL
  .\cygpcre.dll

When I compiled the source *with* ncurses, less worked perfectly with
TERM=nxterm. Is there a reason that the Cygwin binary was compiled without
ncurses (e.g., minimize package dependencies)?

--Rick

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -