delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-WM-Posted-At: | avacado.atomice.net; Thu, 9 May 02 00:23:50 +0100 |
Message-ID: | <018001c1f6e7$6924c420$0100a8c0@advent02> |
From: | "Chris January" <chris AT atomice DOT net> |
To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
References: | <15547 DOT 16136 DOT 163472 DOT 840007 AT bea DOT com><20020415214133 DOT GA19612 AT redhat DOT com> <15577 DOT 12319 DOT 622365 DOT 566799 AT bea DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] gettimeofday time travels |
Date: | Thu, 9 May 2002 00:23:50 +0100 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 |
> > >How about the attached quick and dirty fix? > > > > I'm sorry but I don't think a quick and dirty fix is justified if > > there are other alternatives. I haven't seen any other alternatives > > discussed yet. > > No other alternatives have been proposed. I'm aware of a couple of > other XEmacs'ers who are plagued by this (we love our uptime). > > I don't believe my patch to be dirtier than the implementation (no > offence intended!). Please reconsider it. On Windows NT, you can use the ZwQuerySystemInformation internal call with the SystemTimeOfDayInformation structure to get the current time of day at a greater resolution than you can with the Performance counters. I'm not sure about the granularity though - that's something that would have to be tested. However the value doesn't suffer from time-travelling problems. If indeed the granularity is too coarse, you could still use the value to check that the QueryPerformanceCounters value is sane (which is what I believe this discussion was originally about). Regards Chris -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |