Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 8 May 2002 13:29:05 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: ftp / inetd problem
Message-ID:	<20020508172905.GA6152@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<229D7C0FE0BED311A0E800805F0DD471010D2DF9 AT wn01ex DOT wn DOT gb DOT solvay DOT com> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20020508094140 DOT 027969a8 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<5.1.0.14.2.20020508094140.027969a8@pop3.cris.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 09:59:14AM -0700, Randall R Schulz wrote:
>>Recent cygwin snapshots should fix this problem.
>
>But I now that I read Chris's brief reply, I'm uncertain whether the patch 
>he mentions is to tar or to Cygwin1.dll, but my guess is that it's the 
>latter.

"Recent cygwin snapshots should fix this problem" would sort of preclude
the need for guessing that it would be a tar patch.

That + Corinna's response:

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-04/msg00481.html

really should be pretty clear.

I don't know if this solves the problem mentioned in this email or not.
There is an obvious way to find out if it does.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -